The negatives is that you’re always reacting to the other team and their movements and never really in control over what happens which you can be in a positional defensive system. If some flexibility is allowed between the players then they can also pass over players to each other which can help the team from not destabilising their structure completely. The positives of collective man-marking is you can hopefully stop a team from playing their normal game as they won’t be comfortable receiving the ball under aggressive pressure and tight marking of a defender. In the game examples below we’ll take a closer look at this. However, we’ve seen teams like Atalanta and Genoa perform this style of defending perfectly during the course of the season. In the modern game, this is harder to pull off as players move more freely and are more similar athletically. So if the defending player only has one player in his zone then he marks that player while if there are two players in his zone then he marks the most dangerous one meaning the one closest to the defender’s goal.Ĭollective man-marking was the most used defensive setup back in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s where each player had a direct opponent to mark.
#Mark man markm447 free#
If, however, the striker moves into the left-back’s zone and is closer to the defender’s goal than the winger then the left-back will leave the winger free and move back to mark the striker. For example, a left-back has his zone and if he has a winger in front of him then he will mark the winger. This variant was quite common in the past where each player was assigned a zone and marked the most dangerous player in that zone. This can limit the opposition’s chances of accessing a key area of the pitch where they look to create chances. This player will man-mark anyone that moves into this zone, whether it’s a classic number 10 positioned there, a striker dropping deeper to receive or a midfielder pushing on. However, just like with individual man-marking, if the marked players moves wide for example then huge spaces will open up in the centre of the pitch for other players to exploit as the defending teams midfielders has moved wide and vacated the middle.Īlso, some teams use a player that marks a specific zone, for example the ten space just in front of the back four.
This can be effective in terms of stopping a team playing through midfield and forcing them to go long or along the sides where they are likely to cause less trouble. This approach was something we saw last season with Louis van Gaal’s Manchester United as the central midfielders man-marked their direct opponents in midfield. The negatives are that if the marked player is clever and moves into uncomfortable positions for the marking player then it can cause problems as spaces can open in dangerous areas where the rest of the team can struggle to cover. The positives of this approach are obvious you can limit the influence of a key player within the opposition by marking him tightly and restricting the opposition of playing through one of their most important players. We often see this in the centre of midfield too, for example Danny Welbeck man-marking Xabi Alonso very effectively in the Champions League round of 16 in 2013 or Ji-Sung Park doing it brilliantly against Andrea Pirlo in 2010. However if someone else covers this space then the positives are that the marked players influence can be limited and stifled. With a player like Messi who likes to move freely, this causes the defensive team a problem as the player will vacate his position and a space will open up. Athletic Club used this in the 2015 final of the Copa Del Rey with left back Mikel Balenziaga tasked with marking Messi and following around. For example, many teams have used this tactic against Lionel Messi in a bid to limit his influence on a game. This type of man-marking is quite common as one player within the defending team marks a direct opponent. In this article we’ll look at the different types of man-marking most often used and also use video analysis to look at which teams implements this strategy successfully. This season in Italian football especially, we’ve seen many teams adopt man-marking defensive setups in specific areas or across the pitch. The differing styles and ideas is what make football such a fascinating sport tactically and there is no right or wrong way within the game of football. The same goes for defending where some uses a strict positional defensive style and others implements man-marking across the pitch. Some prefer short passing with plenty of combinations when attacking while others like long balls to a target striker to try to create chances.
There are many different ways to play football.
0 kommentar(er)
